LearnWell Dental Institute
Ethics for Dental Care: Values, Obligations, Rights
| Course Number |
LW03-4263-05010
|
| Objectives |
At the end of the Health Care Ethics course, you will be equipped to
make basic ethical decisions on abortions, suicide, cloning, and patient
information.
|
| Credit Hours and Fee |
3.0 CE Credit Hours with a fee of $24.00 |
| Instructor |
Rudolf Klimes, PhD (Indiana University), MPH
(Johns Hopkins University), Adjunct Professor at Folsom Lake College,
Folsom CA. |
Welcome to this 3-contact-hour
Continuing Education course with instant online processing and
certification 24/7. Study the course below, take the 12-question
multiple-choice TEST,
register and pay online. If you score 75% or above, you may print your CE
certificate on your printer as soon as you finish. If you have difficulty printing your certificate, click here.. You may retake the test once.
| Abortions? |
Suicide? |
Cloning? |
Consent? |
Introduction
In many ways, health care is an art and a
scientific endeavor. Professionals try to act in ways that promotes the
best health of the patient. But it is not always clear what is best for the
patient. Thus at times choices have to be made that focus on what is best for
the mother or what is best for the unborn child, what is best for the individual
or her relatives, what medical records can be disclosed and what must be held in
strictest confidentiality. These issues and many more are all ethical choices
and the filed of study of health care ethics.
Health Care Ethics is the study of moral issues that concern health
care professionals in medicine, nursing, law, sociology, philosophy, and
theology. It deals with health care values, obligations, rights and needs.
Medical ethics in particular traces its roots to the old Greek Hippocratic Oath,
which required physicians above all to "do no harm."
Self-study
Explore Bioethics
Resources Ethics in
Health Care Ethics Quick
Test

1. Shall she have an abortion or
not? |
One short way to define ethics is to call it the study of right and
wrong. Ethics seeks answers to questions like "Is it OK to have an
abortion?"
"What is usually the right thing to do?" In our study of ethical
issues, we will often present the opinions of four characters, namely Small
Pinker and Small Browner, and Big Pinker and Big Browner. Later you will
learn who these characters really are. Here are their four answers. Do some
sound better than
others?
"I would never have an abortion"................................................."I
had four abortions. What is the big deal?"
"Sometimes it may be OK to abort"...........................................
"How late can I have an abortion?"
It's the Choice of the Mother: Abortion;
Ethics or
It's a Life of its Own: National Right to
Life
1.1 Against
abortions
The outward manifestations of Post Abortion Syndrome
can include:
1. Self-destructive behavior - suicidal behavior - drug and alcohol abuse
- eating disorders - domestic violence
2. Chronic problems with relationships - marriage and family breakdown -
child neglect and abuse
3. Mental health disorders - postnatal depression - depression - anxiety
attacks - compulsive disorders and other mental health problems
Abortion is listed as one of the possible precipitating causes of
post-traumatic stress disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of
Mental Disorder. Many women suffering abortion trauma are not consciously
aware that the abortion is the root cause of their problems. Health professionals
are not being trained to identify, treat or prevent Post Abortion
Syndrome. Very few counselors or health professionals are prepared to deal with
abortion trauma, and even fewer are skilled to do so. Most women seriously
damaged by abortion have no access to the professional help they need.
1.2 The Voice of One who had an
Abortion
Description of the Abortion Procedure:
A surgical abortion is usually given up to
anywhere between 7 and 24 weeks of pregnancy. You are numbed by a shot that is
given in your cervix, which dulls most of the pain, but not all. Then they
dilate you with a metal instrument. A tube is inserted into your vagina and a
vacuum sucks the the tissues (fetus and placenta) from the uterus. There are
other ways of removing the fetus. If you have been pregnant for 7 weeks or less,
you may be given a medication to terminate the pregnancy. This sometimes
doesn’t work and is rarely used. This method takes anywhere from 3 days to
3-4 weeks. Another way is induce early labor. This is usually done after 22
weeks of pregnancy. This could take anywhere from a few minutes to several
days.
After Care: Right after the abortion, the woman is observed to see if her blood
pressure, heart rate, and bleeding is normal. Before she goes home she may
be given an antibiotic, and a 24 hour number to call if any problems
occur. For the rest of that same day, it is required for her to keep
active. This will reduce the chance a problems. For the next 2-4
weeks, she cant use douche, swim, take tub baths, use tampons, or have
intercourse.
Abortion Post Exam: Three weeks after the abortion, it is required that you have an exam with
your abortion clinic or with your own health care provider. This exam will
usually consist of a pregnancy test and cervical check. This is to make
sure the abortion is complete and to discover and treat any problems that may
have developed.
Risks: Reaction to anesthesia,
excessive bleeding, infection, puncture of the uterus (rare), emotional or psychological distress, increase chance of breast
cancer
Cost: The cost
varies with different surgeons, clinics, how far along the pregnancy is, etc.
Normally if you are between 5 and 12 weeks of pregnancy with no health problems,
the cost is 400-600 dollars.
Teen Pregnancy and Abortion: Each year, one million teenagers become pregnant and 85%
are unintended. Of all the teenage women who become pregnant, 35% choose to have
an abortion. In some states clinics require a legal guardian’s permission
to have an abortion. But in other states it is strictly
confidential.
NOTE: It is
recommended that the woman makes the decision on her own and doesn’t have any
doubts at all. This is to avoid emotional distress after the abortion. Although
it is normal for a woman to feel happiness, sadness, relief, anger,
gratefulness, disappointment, confidence, fear, loneliness, and guilt. In most
clinics counselors will talk to the women about their decision and all their
options that include to terminate the pregnancy, keep the baby, or adoption.
SOURCE: http://www.sydneysabortion.8m.com/
In 1999, 861,789 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC by 48
reporting areas. This total represents a 2.5 percent decrease from the 884,273
legal induced abortions reported by these same reporting areas for
1998.
The abortion ratio for 1999 is the lowest reported since 1975. The
ratio was 256 legal induced abortions per 1,000 live births, compared to 264 in
1998.
For 1997 through 1999, the abortion rate was 17 per 1,000 women
aged 15– 44 years.
Most abortions were obtained by white women, unmarried
women, and women under 25 years of age. As in previous years, about one-fifth of
women who had abortions were 19 years old or younger. Of the women who had an
abortion, 41 percent were known to have had no previous live births.
For
1999, 25 areas reported a total of 6,278 medical (non-surgical) procedures. This
figure reflects an increase of 28% from the 4,899 medical abortions reported by
22 reporting areas for 1998. It is not known whether the number of medical
abortions reported to CDC for 1999 is representative of all reporting
areas.
As in previous years, more than half (58 percent) of reported
legal induced abortions were performed during the first 8 weeks of pregnancy; 88
percent were performed during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
2. Is suicide ever
right? |
"I have not asked to come into this world, and I don't
have a right to make the decision when I am to leave." That is a very common
opinion, and it has been prevalent throughout history among most cultures. But
for some, the pain of living seems too great. Can a health care professional
ever go against her vow to do no harm and help a patient to end her
life?
Assisted Suicide: The
person most associated with that topic is J. Kevorkian, MD. ERGO!'s
Euthanasia World Directory
Voluntary Suicide: Suicide by
teenagers and adults is a mental health problem addressed broadly by many
hotlines and volunteer organizations. SA\VE, Suicidology, Suicide Prevention
Triangle
Some terms from the Death with Dignity National Center:
Advance Directive - a general
term that describes two kinds of legal documents, living wills and
durable powers of attorney. These documents allow a person to give
instructions about future medical care should he or she be unable to participate
in medical decisions due to serious illness or incapacity. Each state regulates
the use of advance directives differently.
Aid-in-Dying - a physician's response to a request from a
terminally ill, mentally competent adult for the means to hasten death at a time
of the patient's own choosing. This usually takes the form of a prescription for
lethal medication that the patient may obtain and self-administer. Advocates
stress that aid-in-dying should occur only in the context of strict guidelines
and safeguards to ensure that reversible causes of despair have been addressed,
and that a request is rational, voluntary and enduring.
Comfort Care - an approach to care of the dying that emphasizes
the relief of discomfort rather than cure of illness or prolongation of life.
Physical, social and emotional needs are the first priority, even when treatment
such as high dose pain medication may have the effect of hastening death. Also
called palliative care. Considered legal and ethical in all
jurisdictions.
Death with Dignity - A death that is consistent with an individual's
personal values and sense of integrity. This may vary considerably between
individuals and clinical circumstances. What is tolerable and meaningful for one
individual may be unacceptable to another.
Do-Not-Resuscitate Order (DNR)
- also called a "no code," a DNR is usually placed on a patient's medical
chart to indicate there should be no attempt to restart a failed heartbeat or
apply cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to restore normal breathing. A DNR
order can be changed and experts say it should be reviewed regularly. In a DNR
situation, a patient is still provided comfort care. Without such an order,
emergency medical technicians are legally required to perform CPR.
Double Effect - a doctrine established
by St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th Century that an action having two effects: a
good one that is intended, and a bad one that is foreseen. The action is
acceptable if the actor intends only the good effect. The doctrine is often
applied to the use of high doses of morphine and to terminal sedation, in
which the action is intended to relieve suffering but the predictable effect is
to cause death. Sometimes called indirect euthanasia, this
practice is considered ethical and legal.
Durable Power of
Attorney -a document naming a
person to make medical decisions in the event that the individual becomes unable
to make those decisions himself or herself. Also called health care
proxy.
Hospice
- an organization offering comfort care for the dying when
medical treatment is no longer expected to cure the disease or prolong life. The
term may also apply to an insurance benefit that pays the costs of comfort care
(usually at home) for patients with a prognosis of six months or less to
live.
Life-Sustaining
Treatment - any
treatment that, if discontinued, would result in death. This includes
technological interventions such as dialysis and ventilators, and also simple
treatments such as feeding tubes and antibiotics.
Patient Self-Determination
Act - a 1991 federal law
requiring health care facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funds to
inform patients of their right to execute advance directives
concerning their end-of-life care.
Terminal Sedation - a coma-like state induced when symptoms such as
pain, nausea, breathlessness or delirium cannot be controlled while keeping the
patient conscious. Patients die after a number of days of the secondary effects
of sedation, such as dehydration or pneumonia.
Withholding or
Withdrawing - to omit or cease
life sustaining treatment, such as a ventilator, feeding tube, or
medication that, if used, would prolong the patient's life. Sometimes done upon
patient request, but also in accordance with an advance directive or because of
judgments of medical futility. Recognized as legal and ethical in every
jurisdiction.
Death with Dignity National Center,1818 N Street,
NW Suite 450 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 530-2900 admin@deathwithdignity.org
http://www.deathwithdignity.org/
Copyright (c) 1998. Distribution and reprinting permitted as long as this
copyright notice is included. All Rights Reserved.

In the last few years, various forms of genetic research have yielded
spectacular results. Sooner or later, someone will attempt to clone humans. Will
this open the door to advance science and produce spare human parts or
send us into a bigger social mess than we can even imagine?
Reproduction:
Genes: All the Virology
on the WWW - Viral Vectors and Gene Therapy
The National Bioethics Advisory Commission concluded in 1997 that at this
time it is morally unacceptable for anyone in the public or private sector,
whether in a research or clinical setting, to attempt to create a child using
somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning. The Commission reached a consensus on
this point because current scientific information indicates that this technique
is not safe to use in humans at this point. Indeed, the Commission believes it
would violate important ethical obligations were clinicians or researchers to
attempt to create a child using these particular technologies, which are likely
to involve unacceptable risks to the fetus and/or potential child. Moreover, in
addition to safety concerns, many other serious ethical concerns have been
identified, which require much more widespread and careful public deliberation
before this technology may be used.
When the media report on cloning in the news, they are usually talking
about only one type called reproductive cloning. There are different types of
cloning however, and cloning technologies can be used for other purposes besides
producing the genetic twin of another organism. A basic understanding of the
different types of cloning is key to taking an informed stance on current public
policy issues and making the best possible personal decisions. The following
three types of cloning technologies will be discussed: (1) recombinant DNA
technology or DNA cloning, (2) reproductive cloning, and (3) therapeutic
cloning.
Physicians from the American Medical Association and scientists with the
American Association for the Advancement of Science have issued formal public
statements advising against human reproductive cloning. Currently, the U.S.
Congress is considering the passage of legislation that could ban human cloning.
See the Policy and
Legislation links.
Due to the inefficiency of animal cloning (only about 1 or 2 viable
offspring for every 100 experiments) and the lack of understanding about
reproductive cloning, many scientists and physicians strongly believe that it
would be unethical to attempt to clone humans. Not only do most attempts to
clone mammals fail, about 30% of clones born alive are affected with "large
offspring syndrome" and other debilitating conditions. Several cloned animals
have died prematurely from infections and other complications. The same problems
would be expected in human cloning. In addition, scientists do not know how
cloning could impact mental development. While factors such as intellect and
mood may not be as important for a cow or a mouse, they are crucial for the
development of healthy humans. With so many unknowns concerning reproductive
cloning, the attempt to clone humans at this time is considered potentially
dangerous and ethically irresponsible.
4. How much does the doctor tell
you? |
This question does not only deal with physicians, but also with nurses and
other health care professionals. Generally it is a comfort for patients to know
that they can learn what is wrong with them, and that they have control about
the passing on of that information. But should the health care
professional always tell the patient what is going on? And can she pass
that information to others?
Protection vs. autonomy: Physician
Recommendations and Patient.
Patient Consent and the Human
Experiment: Medical
Experiments on Human Beings
- CHICAGO (Reuters) 12-22-1999- U.S. physicians rarely fully
inform their patients about the care-giving decisions affecting them, a survey
of more than 1,000 doctor-patient discussions concluded on
Tuesday.
- Audiotapes of 1,057 patient visits involving 59 primary
care physicians and 65 general and orthopedic surgeons revealed that only 9
percent of 3,552 medical decisions made met the researchers' criteria of
complete informed consent.
-
- The criteria for informed decision-making was defined by
researchers at the University of Washington, Seattle, as making the patient
aware of his or her role in the decision, the nature of the treatment,
alternative treatments, the pros and cons of the alternatives, the patient's
understanding of the decision, and the patient's preferences.
-
- The physicians were found to be more likely to explain to
patients the nature of the planned medical intervention but were unlikely to
assess the level of patients' understanding. There are quality-of-care
concerns, since there is mounting evidence that inadequate patient involvement
may interfere with patient acceptance of treatment and adherence with medical
regimens,'' the report's author, Clarence Braddock III, wrote in the Journal
of the American Medical Association. This low level of informed
decision-making suggests that physicians' typical practice is out of step with
ethical ideals,'' he wrote. A shortage of time, especially for primary care
physicians, is part of the problem.
Consumer Control
over Health Information
Patients have significant new rights to understand and control how their
health information is used.
Patient education on privacy protections. Providers and health plans are
required to give patients a clear written explanation of how they can use, keep,
and disclose their health information.
Ensuring patient access to their medical records. Patients must be able to
see and get copies of their records, and request amendments. In addition, a
history of most disclosures must be made accessible to patients.
Receiving patient consent before information is released. Patient
authorization to disclose information must meet specific requirements. Health
care providers who see patients are required to obtain patient consent before
sharing their information for treatment, payment, and health care operations
purposes. In addition, specific patient consent must be sought and granted for
non-routine uses and most non-health care purposes, such as releasing
information to financial institutions determining mortgages and other loans or
selling mailing lists to interested parties such as life insurers. Patients have
the right to request restrictions on the uses and disclosures of their
information.
Ensuring that consent is not coerced. Providers and health plans generally
cannot condition treatment on a patient's agreement to disclose health
information for non-routine uses.
Providing recourse if privacy protections are violated. People have the
right to complain to a covered provider or health plan, or to the Secretary,
about violations of the provisions of this rule or the policies and procedures
of the covered entity.
Self-study Simulation 1
Simulation 2
Library
Explore Glossary Core
Curriculum: Bioethics Terms Ethics
Glossary
TEST
Study
this web-site for 3 hours for an approved 3-hours
Continuing Education Certificate (0.3 CEUs).
Click
here for the self-correcting test.